Retina and Vitreous
Outcomes of Vitrectomy for Retained Lens Fragments
Borne M., Tasman W., Regillo C., Malecha M. and Sarin L.
Ophthalmology 1996;103:971-976
The rate of lens dislocation into the posterior chamber during
phacoemulsification has been reported to be 0.8%. In
a 1991 study of Medicare patients, the risk for retinal detachment (RD)
after phacoemulsification was reported to be 1.17% in those 65 and older.
When an anterior vitrectomy was performed, the RD rate increased to 5%. This paper documents the course of 121 patients who
underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for
retained lens material at Wills Eye Hospital. The PPV
technique is believed to be the safest and most effective
method for this task. The series reveals the following results:
- Statistically similar visual acuities were reached
regardless if vitrectomy was performed within one week of
surgery or not. The timing of vitrectomy surgery for
retained lens fragments may not be as important as
previously thought.
- The use of perflourocarbons (18 patients - 15%) during
surgery did not statistically effect the RD rate or final
visual outcome.
- The placement of an intraocular lens into the anterior or
posterior chamber, whether during the original surgery or
subsequently did not statistically affect the final visual
acuity.
- The risk for RD after vitrectomy in general is between 4%
and 6%. The rate of RD found in this study was 18% (19 eyes).
Visual Acuity was 20/200 or less in 68% of these patients.
The cumulative rate of RD post PPV for retained
lens fragments in the literature is 17%, with half occurring prior to
vitrectomy. Dislocation of nuclear material into the vitreous
during phacoemulsification increases the risk for RD which subsequently
increases the risk for a poor visual outcome.
Most eyes do well after PPV for retained nuclear fragments. Visual
acuity was 20/40 or better in 68% of patients in this study. Of all the
complications which can result after losing
nuclear material into the vitreous, RD is the most important factor with respect
to visual outcome. The authors recommend first
looking for a retinal tear or detachment. If none is present, they
suggest one can wait until other symptoms (eg. persistent pressure elevation,
corneal edema or marked decreased visual acuity) occur
before proceeding to vitrectomy.
Retina and Vitreous
Prognostic Factors for Retinal Vein Occlusion - A Prospective Study of 175 Cases
Glacetbernard A, Coscas G, Chabanel A, Zourdani A, Lelong F, Samama MM
Ophthalmology. 103(4):551-560, 1996 Apr
Background:
The prognosis of retinal vein occlusion is highly unpredictable because nonischemic types may convert into ischemic types within the first months. This study was designed to identify epidemiologic characteristics of the different types of retinal vein occlusion, their visual outcome, and their prognostic factors. Methods:
The authors analyzed prospectively the data from patients who have had retinal vein occlusion with complete medical and biologic
examination, including fluorescein angiography, and a 1-year follow-up. Results: One hundred seventy-five retinal vein occlusion eyes consisted of
120 central retinal vein occlusions (CRVO), 7 hemicentral occlusions, and
48 branch occlusions. In initially nonischemic CRVO eyes, retinal ischemia
developed in 54%. The study of prognostic factors in the CRVO group showed
that older age, male sex, and the number of risk factors (systemic
vascular risk factors and glaucoma) were correlated with a poor visual
outcome and with the development of retinal ischemia, as well as baseline
visual acuity, initial extent of retinal ischemia, and theologic findings
(hematocrit, fibrinogen, and erythrocyte aggregation levels). Logistic
regression underlined the prognostic role of sex, the number of risk
factors, erythrocyte aggregation, and initial clinical features.
Persistent macular edema was shown to be associated with hyperlipidemia
and cardiovascular history, and inversely correlated to glaucoma. Conclusion: Because clinical characteristics of CRVO may worsen, the
authors' results provide a basis to predict visual outcome by taking into
account epidemiologic and theologic findings. A careful follow-up of these
patients is recommended.
Authors' abstract, Oph
Univ of Paris, France
Retina and Vitreous
Primary Retinal Vasculitis
George R, Walton RC, Whitcup S, Nussenblatt R
Ophthalmology 1996;103(3):384-389
When the retinal circulation is inflamed without associated disease or infection
the term "primary retinal vasculitis" is used. This study was commisioned to find
out which tests are valuable given this diagnosis and to find out if systemic diseases
surface in the future.In this retrospective study, NEI records from 1984-1994 were reviewed. 25 patients were
identified with the diagnosis of primary retinal vasculitis. The mean follow-up time
was 4.4 years with four patients being lost to follow-up. The mean visual acuity
was 20/100 (20/20 to NLP). On the initial exam, one patient had a Review of Systems
suggestive of systemic disease and a subsequent positive ANA DS DNA positive result.
This patient was eventually diagnosed with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Of
the remaining twenty patients, 5 (20.8%) had false-positive laboratory tests. None
of these went on to develop a systemic disease. One patient died of unknown cause. The authors suggest the work of a patient with primary retinal vasculitis be focused.
If a complete history, Review of Systems and eye exam is negative, they suggest the
following be performed: IVF (fluorescein angiogram), complete blood count, sed rate, urinalysis, RPR,
FTA-ABS/HATTS, chest X-ray and an HIV test. If the Review of Systems suggests a collagen vascular disease, extended ANA testing
should be performed.
Raymond G. Magauran, M.D.
Buffalo, New York
Retina and Vitreous
Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS): A Randomized Trial of Immediate Vitrectomy and of Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Postoperative Bacterial Endophthalmitis
The EOVS Group
Arch Ophthalmol, 113:1479-1496, 1995 Dec.
Brief Summary:
This multicenter randomized clinical trial involved a total of 420 patients with clinical evidence of endophthalmitis
within 6 weeks after cataract surgery or secondary intraocular lens implantation only (the study does not address fungal, chronic, or
filtration-related endophthalmitis). Follow up at 9 months demonstrated a 50% reduction in severe visual loss in those patients
presenting with light perception vision only. No statistically significant outcome differences were reported for vitrectomy (VIT) vs.
vitreous tap (TAP) as modalities of diagnosis in combination with antibiotic injection. They purport no role for systemic antibiotic
administration.Discussion:Time and space constraints prevent me from outlining all of the problems associated with this study and its flawed (or at
least not substantiated conclusions). Firstly, it must be noted that this was not truly randomized as the worst patients on presentation were not enrolled and underwent
surgery if the surgeons' clinical judgement was that immediate vitrectomy was required, if a fungal endophthalmitis was suspected, if
the patient had a previous injection of antibiotic by a referring physician, or if the patient had a choroidal detachment. Moreover, if the
TAP patient did not do well after 36 hours then the surgeon could perform a VIT. This effectively presents a selection bias with the
worst patients in the VIT group and the best prognosis patients in the TAP group. Also, the TAP group was itself heterogenous as the
"TAP" was also obtained by pars plana VIT instrumentation. Secondly, only amikacin and vancomycin were used intraocularly (and not ceftazidime and vancomycin as has become standard in many
major centers in the last 2 years). Ceftazidime was only used subconjuctivally. Thirdly, the intravenous medications were only ceftazidime and amikacin (both of which do not cover Gram positive organisms, the
most common encountered). This would imply that for Gram positive endophthalmitis, no difference SHOULD be seen between IV and
"no IV" treatment groups. A more appropriate combination would have been vancomycin and ceftazidime. Fourthly, although the final visions were the same between these (unequal) groups, the media clarity was superior in the VIT group--of
obvious benefit in one-eyed patients. Fifth, as 75-80% of the organisms found were Gram positive (and usually coagulase negative) cocci it is perfectly predictable that there
would be no difference in the outcomes vis a vis sterilization. (How about more detail on the outcomes in the infections with other
organisms?). Sixth, they conclude that TAP/VIT and antibiotic injection alone (without IV antibiotics) is more cost effective and will reduce the
hospital stays--the data do not address this conclusion at all! In fact, this issue is not addressed at all in their data and to make this kind
of conclusion only gives unsubstantiated and possibly erroneous ammunition to managed care plans interested in kicking grandma out of
the expensive hospital beds. Points that I found favorable included:
- The finding that creatinine levels did not rise any more in the IV treated vs non-IV treated patients.
- They proved that the media cleared more quickly after VIT.
- They demonstrated a halving of the risk of severe visual loss between these unequal groups (despite the built in bias against the VIT patients).
- They acknowledge that their conclusions re: IV meds apply ONLY to the drugs that they used and they acknowledge the
possible role of IV antibiotics in other forms of endophthalmitis (such as after filtration surgery, in chronic endopthalmitis, or
after penetrating intraocular trauma).
In short, I find this paper multiply flawed and over-reaching in its conclusions. One must bear in mind the selection bias inherent in the
study, the non-currently standard IV medication combination used, and the lack of data to support their fiscal conclusion. I don't blame
the study organizers as these multi-center trials by their very design and execution require the time lag to conclusion that permit these
flaws to be uncovered (the only major problem with these types of studies). Also, the treatment recommendations on which the study
was done was using the best data available at the time. I would suggest that these results be used as additional data in making that
complex decision of what to do when faced with the individual to whom statistics do not directly apply. Just ask yourself, "What would
I do if this was my mother?"
Ranjit (Randy) Dhaliwal, MD, FRCSC
Augusta, GA
Retina and Vitreous
Clinical Correlation of Ultrasonographic findings in Macular Holes
Gregg T. Kokame
Am J Ophthalmol , 119, 4: 441-451. Apr 1995.
This study tested Gass's theory that vitreous traction on central fovea is a cause of idiopathic macular hole. It also compared detection of
macular traction by b-scan and contact lens biomicroscopy.The vitreomacular relationships in 44 patients, with 47 eyes with macular holes. Both the involved and fellow eye were examined using
static and kinetic techniques. One presented with 20/200 vision in an eye with a central foveal elevation. A vitreomacular attachment was removed, vision was 20/30
at six months post-op. In another, vision was 20/100 in the affected eye, by visualization vitreous appeared clear, b-scan exam revealed
insertion of a vitreous fiber to the macula. There was no surgery, the hole doubled in size over 9 months. In 30 of 35 eyes with macular hole, attachment of the vitreous to macula was shown with b-scan. There was 94% correlation of findings
by echography and biomicroscopic exam: In three eyes, echography revealed PVD not visualized, and other evidence supported
echography. In 60% (24 eyes) , the fellow eye had echographic evidence for vitreomacular attachment, and in 9 of these, there was fiber insertion to
the macula. This provided further support for the cortical vitreous traction theory of macular holes. It provides support for the use of ultrasound
examination each eye of the patient who presents with macular hole.
Tom M, Maida
Gainesville, FL
Retina and Vitreous
Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Chronic Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema
Harbour et al
Am Jour Ophthalmol , Sept 1995;120:302-307
This is a retrospective review of 23 pseudophakic eyes with vitreous adhesion to anterior segment structures and one eye with iris
capture of the intraocular lens. All had cystoid macular edema (CME) and had failed to improve on medical therapy (usually consisting
of topical steroid and/or a nonsteroidal agent). CME was diagnosed by biomicroscopy in 13 patients and fluorescein angiography in 11.
Vitrectomy was performed from four to 66 months after cataract surgery. Postoperatively, all patients improved with a mean
improvement of 4.7 Snellen lines (range, one to eight lines).For the purposes of discussion, I will eliminate the patient with iris capture. That patient's improvement (from 20/80 to 20/70) was not
remarkable, and for purposes of this discussion, it does not seem logical to put this isolated patient into a larger category with the other
23 patients. The inclusion criteria for this study would eliminate most of the patients normally seen with CME and vitreous adhesion anteriorly. The
23 patients in this study were all unresponsive to topical therapy. Additionally, patients were eliminated with visually significant diabetic
retinopathy, uveitis, epiretinal membrane, retained crystalline lens fragments, or other significant retinal disease. It is interesting that
none of the patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids and that three of the patients never received any type of steroid. Nd:YAG
vitreolysis was attempted (unsuccessfully) in one patient. The length of time from the initial cataract surgery did not influence the visual
outcome. The data suggested that the location of lens (anterior versus posterior chamber) influenced visual outcome, but the greater
improvement with anterior chamber lenses did not reach statistical significance. The authors conclude that vitrectomy is useful in patients
with CME and vitreous adherent to anterior structures who have failed to improve with medical treatment.
Keith D. Fisher, M.D.
Texas
Retina and Vitreous
Pneumatic Retinopexy Failures: Cause, Prevention, Timing and Management
Grizzard et al
Ophthalmology June, 1995;102(6):929-936
In this retrospective analysis of 107 patients treated by two physicians over a 3 year period, success rates for pneumatic retinopexy
(pneumatic) were examined in view of liberalized indications for the procedure. The authors state that the criteria classically used for
pneumatic are: Superior break(s) less than one clock hour; Good view of the entire retina; and Absence of proliferative vitreo-retinopathy
(PVR). The authors have relaxed the criteria to include early PVR (with a fixed fold in one quadrant) and vitreous hemorrhage obscuring
the inferior retina.An initial success rate of about 70% is my standard quote given to patients selected using the old criteria for pneumatic. This is
compared to an 85 to 90% success rate for buckle. The authors got a 69.2% success rate on the first pneumatic and were able to raise
that rate to 71% by doing a second pneumatic on 2 eyes. Using classical criteria their success rate was 75.3%. Follow-up ranged from 1
to 44 months (since the study ended in '92 it would have been nice to have had at least 6 months f/u on everyone). The data on complications and failures should be studied closely, but is beyond the scope of my 200 words. Notably, macular hole was
seen in one patient and subretinal gas was seen in two (both of whom had successful reattachment). Failures were seen more commonly
in males, preop vision worse than 20/50, eyes with four quadrants of detachment, and eyes with "additional pathology." Failures are
usually due to breaks that are new, missed, reopened, or never closed. The authors make the point that preop patient selection and
careful examination is key for maximizing success. This is an excellent article and should be studied closely by anyone considering
performing pneumatics. Economic factors will force this procedure on patients and physicians regardless of whether we like this
procedure or not.
Keith D. Fisher, M.D.
Southeast Retina Assoc, Texas
Retina and Vitreous
Laser-Induced Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Treatment of Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. Ian L. McAllister, FRACO, Ian J. Constable, FRACO
Arch Ophthalmol 113: 456-462, 1995, Apr
A non-ischemic CRVO may progress to an ischemic CRVO. The authors attempt to alter the progression rate by performing high power, focally intense argon laser treatments to the retinal vasculature to create a retinal venous to choroidal venous anastomosis. Fistual formation was documented by flourescein angiogram during weeks 3 to 7 post laser. Successful anastomoses were made in 33% (8 of 24 eyes). Of these, none progressed to the ischemic form. Of the 16 eyes in which the laser treatment did not create a patent venous connection, 31% (5) progressed to ischemic CRVOs with vision ranging from 6/9 to light perception. There were however a variety of complications which need to be closely addressed in the sure to follow prospective, randomize, multi-centered trial.
The natural progression of CRVO from non-ischemic to ischemic forms is thought to be 20%. In this study, the rate, irregardless of laser treatment, was 31%. Does this form of laser increase the risk for developement of ischemic CRVO?
Raymond G. Magauran III, MD
Buffalo, NY
Retina and Vitreous
Quantification of Retinal Ablation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Venkat M. Reddy, M.D., Rene L. Zamora, M.D. and Joseph Olk, M.D.
Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:760-766
The progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with retinal ablation by pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) with or without cryotherapy was investigated in 275 eyes which had 2 or more risk factors for this disease state. The average number of PRP treatments was 1.7 to cause regression. With one laser treatment, divided into two sessions of 1000-1600 spots, 500um in size, 60% regressed and were considered successfully treated. There were a significant number of eyes requiring "high treatment", in the range of 6,500 spots, 500um in size. With PRP alone, 77% regressed. 46 eyes (15.6%) required additional cryotherapy to the anterior retina. The remainder (7.7%) were considered treatment failures and required pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).
Addition findings revealed 17% of patients developed clinically significant macular edema (CSME).
The authors were unable to identify who would require "high treatment" or PPV. Those with onset of DM before 30 years of age, duration greater than 15 years or more retinopathy risk factors were more likely to need extra PRP/cryo. Finally, they report the amount of PRP needed for regression in most cases of PDR is greater than that which the Diabetic Retinopathy Study found.
Raymond G. Magauran III, MD
Buffalo, NY
Retina and Vitreous
Human Autologous Serum for the Treatment of Full-Thickness Macular Holes- A Preliminary Study. Peter Ligett, MD et al. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1071-6
The authors investigate the efficacy of pars plans vitrectomy and the use of autologous serum in the repair of Stage 3 and 4 macular holes. 9 patients, 11 eyes were enrolled. Ages ranged from 53-80 years old. Follow-up time was 4 to 11 months, mean 4.8 months. Preop vision was 20/80 to 20/200 with a mean of 20/200. All patients underwent the following: Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), air-fluid exchange, drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) from the hole, epiretinal membrane peel (if indicated) and proper head positioning for two weeks. There were no control eyes. They report 100% flattening of the macular hole and decreased SRF. All eyes recovered two lines of vision or more. 3 eyes (27%) achieved and maintained 20/40 or better, 7 (64%) were 20/60 or better. No "excessive fibrous proliferation" was noted. Previous reports show PPV alone successfully closes stage 3 and 4 macular holes in 47% of eyes. With the addition of the expensive TGF-Beta, anatomic success rates increase to 85%. The increased success of autologous serum over PPV alone may make this an efficacious and cost effective way to repair macular holes. We look forward to long term controlled studies to investigate this further. In particular, the success rate at two years or longer needs to be examined. A significant portion of previously repaired holes will break down again and result in recurrent visual loss.
Raymond G. Magauran III, MD
Buffalo, NY
|